Reviewing territory coverage without counting duplicate visits
Coverage should describe distinct properties and meaningful outcomes, not simply the number of map interactions.
A practical approach
Separate unique addresses from repeat attempts and scheduled follow-ups. Use the same reporting period when comparing areas. Review properties with conflicting dispositions before drawing conclusions about performance. A high visit count can reflect repeated attempts at a small group of homes rather than broad coverage.
Put it into practice
- Count distinct properties separately
- Separate repeat attempts
- Review conflicting outcomes
General workflow guidance. Confirm current responsibilities, availability and terms with the appropriate team. This article is not a project-specific technical assessment or a promise of compensation.